Book your consultation

Book Now Mobile

Is Fraud Civil or Criminal Law?

Table of Contents

The simple answer is, it depends! Fraud can be considered both a criminal offense and a civil tort in New South Wales and Australia more broadly. In a criminal fraud case, the state’s attorney is responsible for prosecuting the case, aiming to hold the accused accountable. On the other hand, in a civil fraud case the defrauded individual brings forth a tort claim seeking legal remedies.

What is Fraud?

According to the Attorney General and his office, Fraud can be defined as the ‘dishonestly obtaining a benefit, or causing a loss, by deception or other means.’ Further specifics on the language can be seen in paragraph viii of the  Fraud Control Policy

In New South Wales specifically, section 192E of the Crimes Act 1900 makes it an offence to dishonestly:

  • Obtain property belonging to another;

  • Obtain a financial advantage or cause a financial disadvantage.

Fraud as we know it can embody many forms. Some examples can be seen below :

  1. False representation: Making false statements or misrepresenting material facts, such as property condition or financial information.

  2. Forgery: Creating or altering documents, signatures, or records with the intent to deceive.

  3. White collar crime: An example of which can be a Ponzi Scheme, which is an operating investment scheme that uses new investors’ funds to pay earlier investors, leading to collapse.

  4. Insider Trading: Illegally trading securities based on non-public information, which could also be seen as an individual guilty of committing tax fraud.

  5. Identity Theft: Assuming another person’s identity without consent as part of wider fraudulent activities

  6. Bank Fraud: Deceptive practices to unlawfully obtain funds or assets from financial institutions.

  7. Tax Fraud: Intentional evasion or falsification of information to avoid paying rightful taxes.

  8. False Accounting: Misrepresenting financial records to unlawfully acquire property or assets.

Criminal Fraud

In a criminal case, alleged criminal fraud charges are addressed differently from those of civil fraud. The criminal justice system in Australia treats fraud as a serious offence, as it undermines the integrity of financial transactions and can have significant economic implications. As such, criminal proceedings are taken extremely seriously. Law enforcement agencies, such as state police forces and federal investigative bodies like the Australian Federal Police (AFP), actively investigate and prosecute cases of criminal fraud.

To establish criminal fraud, the burden of proof rests with the prosecution. They must demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused intentionally engaged in deceptive conduct, with the knowledge of its fraudulent nature and the intention to deceive or defraud another person or entity. Convictions for criminal fraud can result in substantial penalties, including fines, imprisonment, or a combination of both. As noted by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions, violation can result in 10 years imprisonment.

However, several legal elements must also be proven by the prosecution. These include the accused’s dishonest conduct with the intention to gain a financial advantage or cause financial loss, engaging in deceptive behaviour, demonstrating specific intent to deceive or defraud, involvement in obtaining a financial advantage or causing financial loss, and establishing a causal connection between the accused’s actions and the resulting financial consequences. These elements collectively form the basis for establishing the offence of criminal fraud.

Civil Fraud

Civil fraud law in Australia encompasses legal principles and regulations that address fraudulent conduct in civil matters. It provides a framework for individuals or businesses who have been defrauded to seek remedies and recover their losses through civil litigation. Under civil fraud law, fraudulent conduct refers to intentional misrepresentation, deceit, or other dishonest acts that cause harm or financial loss to another party.

Establishing a Civil Claim

To establish a claim of civil fraud in Australia, the plaintiff (the defrauded party) typically needs to prove several elements. It is important to note that a civil claim is brought by a private party and not the public prosecution service. These elements include demonstrating that the defendant made false statements or engaged in deceptive conduct, that the false statements were material and relied upon by the plaintiff, and that the plaintiff suffered harm or financial loss as a direct result of the fraudulent conduct.

Once a claim of civil fraud is established, the court may provide various remedies to the defrauded party. These remedies may include compensatory damages, which aim to restore the plaintiff to the position they would have been in had the fraud not occurred. The damages awarded may cover direct losses, consequential damages, and potentially punitive damages in cases of particularly egregious conduct.

Civil Jurisdiction

Civil cases in Australia are typically pursued in magistrates court or a crown court state or federal courts, depending on the jurisdiction and the nature of the fraud. The legal proceedings involve presenting evidence, witness testimonies, and legal arguments to support the plaintiff’s claim of fraud. It is essential for the plaintiff to be able to demonstrate, on the balance of probabilities, that the defendant committed the fraudulent act.

The civil fraud law in Australia serves to protect the rights of individuals and businesses, deter fraudulent activities, and provide a mechanism for redress when fraud occurs. It ensures that those who engage in fraudulent conduct are held accountable for their actions and that victims of fraud have a legal avenue to seek justice and compensation.

Burden of Proof in Civil and Criminal Fraud

Burden and Standard of Proof in Criminal Law System

In the realm of criminal law, the standard of proof revolves around the concept of “reasonable doubt.” The prosecution bears the burden of proving the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt, leaving no reasonable uncertainty in the mind of an impartial person. This standard of proof is intentionally set high, considering that criminal cases often entail severe penalties.

Failure to meet this high threshold results in the acquittal of the accused. However, the notion of “reasonable doubt” itself can be subjective, varying with the circumstances at hand. The jury, in each specific case, determines what doubts are reasonable within the context. Hence, seeking guidance from a legal professional is crucial, as they can provide insights tailored to your particular circumstances. Reach out to one of our experienced criminal lawyers at Jameson Law for a complimentary consultation.

Burden and Standard of Proof in Civil Law System

In the civil law system of Australia, the burden of proof lies with the plaintiff or claimant. However, the standard of proof differs from that in criminal cases. In civil law, the plaintiff must establish their case on the balance of probabilities, meaning it is more likely than not that their claim is true. This standard is lower compared to the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard required in criminal proceedings. The burden of proof rests on the party making the claim in civil cases, who must present evidence supporting their case. Failure to meet this burden may result in the dismissal of their claim.

Frequently Asked Questions

It is important to note that the Australian legal system has provisions and legislation in place to investigate, prosecute, and penalize individuals or entities involved in these fraudulent activities.

Authorities such as the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), the Australian Federal Police (AFP), and the ATO work diligently to detect and address instances of fraud throughout the nation. Through public prosecution, court-ordered fines and other mechanisms, these organisations help protect the integrity of our nation's systems and their people, while ensuring compliance with the law.


Yes, there is a difference in the burden of proof between civil fraud and criminal fraud matters. In civil fraud cases, the burden of proof rests on the plaintiff to establish their case on the balance of probabilities. In criminal fraud cases, the burden of proof lies with the prosecution, who must prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Yes, it is possible for criminal and civil fraud cases to run concurrently in Australia. The civil and criminal justice systems operate independently, and the legal proceedings for each case are distinct. While the burden and standard of proof differ in civil and criminal cases, the same underlying facts and circumstances can give rise to both civil and criminal claims related to fraud. Therefore, it is possible for parallel civil and criminal proceedings to take place simultaneously, addressing the legal aspects and consequences of the alleged fraud from different perspectives. This means that you might be entitled to two legal avenues to seek remedies. Contact our legal professionals at Jameson Law today.

In Australia, the sanctions imposed on an individual for fraud can vary depending on the specific offence committed, the severity of the fraud, and other relevant factors. Some of the sanctions that can be imposed on individuals convicted of fraud in Australia include:

  1. Imprisonment: Individuals found guilty of fraud can face imprisonment as a penalty. Serious cases of fraud, such as large-scale financial fraud or corporate fraud, can result in lengthy prison terms - up to 10 years in Australian federal prison.

  2. Fines: The court can impose fines on individuals convicted of fraud. The amount of the fine may depend on factors such as the financial loss caused by the fraud, the offender's financial situation, and the severity of the offence. The fines can range from moderate to substantial amounts. Not including the amount defrauded, $150,000.

  3. Restitution or Compensation: In cases where the fraud has caused financial harm to victims, the court may order the offender to pay restitution or compensate the victims for their losses. This aims to restore the victims to their pre-fraud financial position and provide them with some form of redress.

  4. Forfeiture of Assets: In certain cases, the court may order the forfeiture of assets acquired through fraudulent means. This can include seizing and confiscating property, funds, or other assets obtained as a result of the fraud.

It is important to note that the specific sanctions imposed for fraud can vary based on the circumstances of each case and the discretion of the sentencing judge. The severity of the offence, the individual's criminal history, and other relevant factors can influence the outcome and the extent of the penalties imposed. Consulting with a legal professional experienced in criminal fraud law, such as our experts at Jameson, can provide further guidance on the potential sanctions for specific fraud offences in Australia.

If you are a victim of fraud in Australia, it is recommended to report the matter to the police and pursue legal action through civil courts. Reporting to the police enables them to investigate the crime and potentially hold the perpetrator criminally accountable. Pursuing the defendant through civil courts allows you to seek compensation for your losses and obtain remedies such as restitution or damages. Both avenues can be pursued concurrently as they serve different purposes, but consulting with a legal professional is important to assess your specific circumstances and receive tailored advice on the best course of action.

Fraud in New South Wales (NSW) can be both a civil and criminal offence. It depends on the circumstances and the nature of the fraud committed. In some cases, fraud may be pursued as a criminal matter, where the state prosecutes the offender, and if convicted, the offender may face penalties such as imprisonment or fines.

On the other hand, fraud can also be addressed through civil proceedings, where the victim of the fraud pursues legal action against the offender to seek compensation for their losses. The determination of whether fraud is treated as a civil or criminal matter in NSW will depend on the specific facts and evidence presented in each case.


02 8806 0866

Book Online


Explore More Legal Resources and Articles

Role Of Victim Impact Statements In Sentencing

  Summary Victim impact statements are important for the criminal process as they can influence the sentencing courts when considering penalties and punishment. Despite the fact they are essentially based on opinion, victim impact statements are written to describe the physical and emotional suffering crime has affected. A victim impact statement can be written by either the primary victim or the family, friends or other affected victims of the primary victim. A victim impact statement can be presented to the court whether the offender pleads guilty or not guilty as it is more relevant to sentencing than it is for proceedings. If you are unsure about anything to do with victim impact statements then you should seek legal advice as soon as possible. Jameson Law have a team of expert criminal lawyers ready and willing to assist you with anything you need. What Is A Victim Impact Statement? A victim impact statement allows the victim a voice within the criminal proceedings. It is a chance for the victim to explain their pain, suffering or mitigation of a crime committed against them. It is important for the court to understand the impact the criminal offending had on the victim so it can factor into two important issues; whether there is a continued risk to the community and whether there should be a harsher or lighter penalty considered. The court is able to use a victim impact statement to factor into sentencing matters for the defendant. At the sentencing hearing, the victim or prosecution will read the victim impact statement aloud to demonstrate the emotional suffering the victim has endured. If the defendant has plead not guilty but been found guilty of the offence, the victim impact statement can be a powerful tool. It can signify to the court the lack of remorse shown by the defendant towards the victim.   Case Study Kayla is the victim of a violent assault where she suffered a fractured skull, broken cheek bones and a broken arm. She was in significant distress at the time the police arrived at the scene. Kayla has spoken to the prosecution about wanting to provide a victim impact statement to the court. Kayla has been having nightmares, flashbacks and anxiety attacks since the assault due to the harm suffered. On top of the physical harm, there is deep emotional harm which she may never recover from. The court process so far has taken its toll on Kayla and she requires the support of both family members and a support person during the court case. The court finds her victim impact statement to have influence in relation to the defendants sentence, The court can see that Kayla has suffered harm at the hands of the defendants and that it has irreversibly changed her life. Is A Victim Impact Statement Required? There is no requirement for a victim to provide a statement about what they have suffered and how it is effecting them. In many instances, it can be too painful for the victim to even contemplate writing a statement or they simply elect not to do so. It can be confronting for a a statement to be read aloud which broadcasts the emotions and suffering of an already vulnerable individual. There are some who do not want their offender to become aware of how much pain, harm or suffering they have caused to their life, particularly if it is someone known to them. Ultimately, the facts, circumstances and harm suffered are presented to the court by the prosecution during the trial, if required, and those factors are taken into account when the determination is made. Who Can Write A Victim Impact Statement? Usually, the term “Victim Impact Statement” leads people to believe that the physical victim of the offence is the only one who can present to the court how the offending has affected them. Yet this is not the case. Criminal offending can have a far reaching effect depending on the circumstances and there may be other victims who feel its impact. The most powerful and life altering example which springs to mind is that of murder. In this instance, the victim of that offence is not able to express how the offending has impacted their lives but their family remains to share their pain and grief. The injury in this case is emotional, not physical.   Case Study Kyle has been found guilty of murder after he hit his best friend, Alex, with a car intentionally. This is a very serious crime. Kyle was upset with Alex over a debt that he owed him and they got into a heated argument when they met at the local pub. Alex went home and got changed so that he could go for a run to clear his head. Alex stayed at the bar and had a few more drinks. He got more and more upset about the argument and pulled out his phone to search for Alex’s location on social media. Kyle saw that he was running a few blocks away. Kyle got into his car and drove a few blocks away to try and find Alex. He saw him running up ahead of him. He put his foot on the accelerator and sped up the road to just behind Alex. He mounted the curb and accelerated into the back of Alex sending him flying over the back of the car where he hit the ground. Unfortunately, Alex died on impact. Alex’s family, specifically his pregnant fiance, submitted powerful victim impact statements to the court. Alex’s fiance lost not only her partner but the father of her unborn child and all the emotional, physical and financial support. It ultimately persuades the judge to attribute a harsher sentence. FAQS What Is Criminal Law? Criminal lawrefers to the punishment for criminal acts committed against individuals within the community. Each criminal court case is subject to either a Judge or Magistrate determining guilt based on evidence brought by the prosecutor and rebutted

Court Procedures in Sydney

Understanding court procedures can be confusing, but being prepared is key. Dressing professionally, bringing the necessary documents, and behaving respectfully In Sydney, court proceedings follow a structured process, from initial appearance to hearings. This article will break down all these areas of a court appearance in more depth. Trust Jameson Law for expert legal representation—they’re dedicated to fighting for your rights and will help you navigate through all the processes of your next appearance in court. Remember, we’re in it to win it! What should I wear while attending court? When attending court in Australia, it’s essential to dress respectfully and professionally. Opt for neat, conservative attire such as business attire or smart casual clothing. Men can wear a suit or dress pants with a collared shirt, while women can choose a pantsuit, dress, or skirt with a blouse. Avoid wearing clothing that is too casual, revealing, or flashy, as it may not be appropriate for the solemn atmosphere of the courtroom. Closed-toe shoes are preferable, and accessories should be kept minimal. Additionally, as the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia points out, you should make sure to take off your sunglasses, hats or caps before you enter the courtroom. Being on time to court is extremely important. If you are late to your hearing or committal proceedings, If the Judge decides, you could be penalised. The maximum penalty that you face could be severe.   In a nutshell… Remember, your appearance reflects your respect for the court, so dressing appropriately shows that you take the proceedings seriously. Procedures to follow Addressing the Judge or Judicial Registrar: In Sydney courts, it’s important to address the Judge as “Your Honour” when speaking to them. For Judicial Registrars, use “Registrar” unless told otherwise. For example, you might say “Yes, your Honour” when addressing a Judge and “Yes, Registrar” when speaking to a Judicial Registrar. Courtroom Etiquette: As the Federal Court of Australia writes about here, Upon entering or leaving a courtroom with a Judge or Judicial Registrar present, it’s customary to bow your head as a sign of respect. This is something you should do in all courts, whether it be a family court, federal court or any other court of New South Wales. Court Proceedings: When your case is called, approach the Bar Table at the front of the courtroom and state your name to the Judge or Judicial Registrar. They will inquire about your claim and may set a timetable for the next steps, such as submitting evidence and pleadings. It’s a good idea to discuss timelines with the other party beforehand. Rule 5.04 outlines the types of orders a Judge may issue. By following these procedures, you ensure smooth communication and respectful conduct in Sydney courts. Contact Jameson Law today for a consultation. Whether it be a question about a court procedure, Maximum Penalties or how to move a hearing date, Jameson Law is a one-stop shop for all your legal needs! What should I Bring to Court? When heading to court in Sydney, it’s crucial to be prepared. Here’s what you should bring: Legal Documents: Bring any relevant paperwork related to your case, including court orders, summons, or legal agreements. It is important to bring 3 sets of documents with you to the court, one set for you, one set for the other party and another set for the judge or registrar. This ensures that court events go as smoothly as possible! Identification: Carry a valid form of identification, such as a driver’s license or passport, to verify your identity if needed. Notes and Evidence: Take notes on key points you want to remember and bring any evidence or documents supporting your case. Contact Information: Have contact details for your lawyer, if you have one, and any witnesses or other parties involved in the case. Pen and Paper: Bring a pen and notebook to jot down important information during the proceedings. A good lawyer: A good lawyer can make all the difference in court. The expert lawyers at Jameson Law are perfect examples of this. Before you get to the courtroom, they will make you understand in depth what is going on. having your understanding of what would happen if you plead guilty, what the maximum penalties might be, or things like how to move a hearing date to make proceedings move as smoothly as possible. Patience and Respect: Lastly, bring patience and a respectful attitude. Court proceedings can be lengthy and sometimes stressful, so maintaining composure and showing respect for the court and others involved is essential for a smooth process. Importance of a good lawyer during court proceedings In court proceedings, a proficient lawyer is essential, and Jameson Law stands out as an expert law firm in Sydney. A skilled lawyer, like those at Jameson Law, provides invaluable guidance, strategic representation, and unwavering support. With their expertise, they navigate complex legal processes, protect your rights, and strive for favourable outcomes. Jameson Law offers personalized attention, ensuring you understand your case and make informed decisions. Their dedication to achieving the best results means you have a strong ally in the courtroom, advocating fiercely for your interests. Trusting Jameson Law ensures you have top-tier legal representation when you need it most. Court behaviour In Sydney courts, proper behaviour is essential. Remember to switch off your mobile phone and nod respectfully when entering or leaving the room. Stand when addressing the judge or when they speak to you, and speak clearly without interrupting others. Be polite to everyone, including the judge or registrar and other parties involved. Take notes to stay organized and track important points. By following these guidelines, you demonstrate respect for the court and ensure smooth proceedings during your time in Sydney courtrooms. Court Appearances in Local Courts In Sydney, court appearances follow a structured process. Initially, when your case is brought before a magistrate, the charge will be recorded, and the final decision may be postponed to another date. If you plead guilty, sentencing might occur immediately for minor charges, but for more serious offences, the magistrate may request a pre-sentence report. If granted bail, you’ll receive a bail notice detailing your court appearance. Upon arrival, check the court lists for your assigned courtroom and be present when your case is called to avoid repercussions, especially if you’re on bail. Between initial appearances and hearings, there may be several ‘callovers’ or ‘mentions’ to schedule the case within the court timetable. Pleas of guilty or not guilty can be lodged during these appearances. Guilty pleas may lead to immediate sentencing or a later date set for sentencing. Not guilty pleas result

Defending Against Domestic Violence Charges

  In a nutshell… Domestic violence is a serious criminal law matter which can leave deep emotional and physical scars. Domestic violence refers to the use of physical, emotional, sexual financial or psychological violence against a spouse, partner, child or close relative. Of the five different categories of violence, charges can be made up of multiple different categories. Domestic violence charges are serious, and they can result in severe penalties. if you have been charged with a domestic violence offence, then you will need to obtain advice from an experienced domestic violence lawyer. Domestic Violence Defences Self defence is one of the most challenging aspects to domestic violence. It is common for a domestic argument to involve violence perpetrated by both parties; therefore, it is difficult to know who the victim is and who the perpetrator is. Self defence means a proportionate response to violence to diffuse a threat of harm. The level of violence required to diffuse the threat is different depending on the situation. For example, an individual may punch their partner in the face and their partner may need to defend themselves. Their defence may be to punch back which would be a proportionate response however to stab the individual would be a disproportionate response. Further criminal charges can also result including grievous bodily harm and assault. False Accusations In many instance, if not all, the alleged perpetrator will deny the existence of violence. There is a percentage of family violence cases which are false but it can be difficult to know whether the violence has or has not occurred. Physical violence has a higher chance of being proven given its nature and the usual existence of physical evidence (i.e. bruising, lacerations, etc). Emotional or psychological violence however, is not as easily proven and it can be word against word. It can therefore be easy for an alleged victim to make a false allegation and have domestic violence charges laid. A domestic violence conviction can result in lifelong consequences which follow and individual. For example, an individual could be accused of calling their partner a “fucking bitch” and making verbal threats to kill them. These threats could have created a genuine fear of harm which is simply word against word because there is no hard evidence of the threat. The threat could have severely impacted the life of the victim because they have increased anxiety and fear, yet they will have difficulty proving that this is the case. Insufficient Evidence A domestic violence case is ultimately dependent on evidence and sometimes, no matter the honesty of the victim, the evidence simply does not exist. A large amount of domestic violence is perpetrated in private, without witnesses, and there is no record. Emotional or psychological abuse for example is perpetrated in subtle ways which may not even be apparent to a close family member. Most domestic violence of this nature makes its way to the surface through family law such as a custody case where behavior is more easily observed. Violence can manifest in ways which are not physical and victims have difficulty explaining the impact the behavior is having. Having a domestic violence matter dismissed due to a lack of evidence however is no guarantee. More evidence may become available and the charges could be laid again. Each domestic violence case only needs to pass the test of beyond a reasonable doubt   Case Study Kayla has been charged with domestic violence charges and is due to come before the court in May. She is charged with two counts of physical violence and one count of emotional violence. Kayla’s boyfriend has made statements to police that Kayla punched him to the throat, scratched him across the back and sent him an abusive text message. Kayla is aware that domestic violence cases carry significant penalties and there are only limited defences. Kayla seeks to rely on self defense because she alleges that her partner hit her first and she was only defending herself when she scratched and punched him. She will however be pleading guilty to the abusive text message. Kayla’s self defense argument is partially accepted however she is still found guilty of assault. She received a suspended sentence. Criminal Justice System Domestic Violence Trial If you have been charged with a domestic violence offence and have chosen to plead not guilty then your matter will proceed to trial. A trial is a process whereby the evidence is presented and tested to determine guilt. It is an expensive and time-consuming legal process. A domestic violence trial under criminal law will be heard in the appellate court, local court or supreme court depending on the severity. A trial in the Supreme Court will be subject to a jury determination. It is the role of the prosecution to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt. Domestic Violence cases heard in the Family Court however are different. No criminal charges can result from a family court trial alone as it is a completely different jurisdiction. If an individual has been accused of domestic violence then this can have flow on effects for their family law matters. A domestic violence charge can indicate risk to either their spouse, partner or child and the court must determine the best course for the family using the best interests principle. Procedural Errors Procedural errors are one of the leading causes of mistrials. A mistrial occurs when the trial or evidence has been compromised in some way and it would be prejudicial to continue. A procedural error may be due to contamination of evidence, property damage or evidence being brought before the court and jury which needs to be disregarded. A procedural error can cause a miscarriage of justice if for some reason the prosecution is unable to retry the case at a later date. You should seek legal advice before making any procedural arguments to ensure correct interpretation of legislation, policies and processes. Both police, the court and each individual lawyer will have


Book your consultation