In a nutshell...
There are various defences which may be available in relation to a murder or homicide charge but they require specific circumstances or factors to be present. Murder, like all indictable criminal offences, is subject to the test of beyond a reasonable doubt to determine guilt.
Jameson Law have a team of expert criminal lawyers ready and willing to assist with all your criminal law needs.
Common Defense Strategies
Mistaken Identity
Whilst it is not an easily proven defense, mistaken identity defense has been proven in some prior cases. Mistaken identity could be as a result of poor witness visibility, difficulties differentiating between ethnicities and races, different times of the day, etc. Mistaken identity relies on a situation whereby an individual could have been identified as the accused due to similarities.
Mistaken identity relies usually on witness evidence being discredited or an alternate theory being provided which might offer an alibi to the accused. There can be other factors such as DNA not matching, or in comparison, a familial DNA match being made which points the finger at the wrong person.
Self defense
Self defense is perhaps one of the most commonly used defense strategies however it is still reliant on certain factors. Self defense relates to the defensive actions of an individual to protect themselves from physical or bodily harm. The defensive action must be proportionate to the force used against them or the threat of harm that exists.
The court will need to consider whether the force used was reasonable force given the situation or threat. For example, if a man was hit to the side of the head in a bar fight and disoriented but not knocked out, it would not be proportionate for him to turn and stab his aggressor. That force would not be considered reasonable to the threat.
Case Study
Criag was arrested for murder once security footage from the entrance to the parking structure was reviewed and his vehicle was seen on the video. Craig was also understood to have been recently in a bar fight with Alan and bruising on the body matched bruising to Craig's hands.
Craig is arguing that the murder was one of self-defense because Alan came at him with a cricket bat. Craig did have some bruising to his torso which was consistent with being struck by a bat. Ultimately, the prosecution are able to argue that Craig's response to Alan's threat of harm is disproportionate and a unreasonable amount of force was used in response.
Mental Health
Insanity Defense
An insanity defense in criminal law is a difficult defense to argue. A plea of insanity is made on the basis that the defendant has a mental illness which is advanced enough to make them unfit to stand trial. It is a serious matter for a court to consider convincing evidence of this nature, particularly in relation to a murder case.
The intentional or accidental taking of a human life is one of the most serious charges an individual can face and it is considered a miscarriage of justice if severe penalties cannot be imposed. To prove an insanity defense however, psychological and psychiatric evidence would need to adduced. An insanity defense is a serious consideration because an individual may be classed as, not only, not fit for trial due to a mental disorder but also not fit for society due to the risk they pose.
Mental Health Facility
If an insanity or mental health argument is successfully made the penalty may be that instead of a term of imprisonment, a mental health facility is recommended. This is often the only mans the court has of protecting the public from possible violent confrontations.
Being subjected to treatment within a health facility does not on its own create the narrative that an individual was cognitively unable to have acted in the manner that they did. Mental health is not a cut and dry situation. Mental health does not provide an explanation for a person intentionally and unlawfully killing another individual.
Case Study
In order for them to have a strong defense strategy, psychiatric evidence will need to be brought which they do not have. Anna's psychologist has diagnosed her with bipolar disorder however it is managed with therapy. Anna alleges that she was subject to significant domestic violence and such circumstances have not led to criminal charges against her husband.
The forensic evidence suggests that there may have been a physical struggle and the crime scene had both Anna and her husband's blood.
Anna's legal team believe that Anna will be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt on the basis that whilst her mental health requires treatment it is not considered to have impaired her ability to make rational decision making. The prosecution hears witness testimony and decides to downgrade to manslaughter charges.
How Do Defense Strategies Influence Sentencing?
If an individual has been considered to act in a manner to constitute murder then a defense strategy may be the only difference between life imprisonment and a lesser sentence. A finding of reasonable force, reasonable belief of harm or even unreasonable force as a self defense strategy may result in charges being downgraded or upgraded depending on the circumstances.
For example, a first degree murder charge may be downgraded to a manslaughter charge or even a justifiable homicide if self defense is proven. The maximum penalty for a proven murder conviction is life imprisonment and a lesser sentence may be the only achievement your legal team can make given the situation.
In comparison, solicitors need to be careful about the defense strategies that they do choose to run. Legal defences need to be both plausible and reasonable for the situation. Representing clients requires not only advocacy for their rights but it requires reasonable advice to be given. For example, a mental health defense which has weak or unconvincing evidence has the potential to anger the court. Angering the court will simply do nothing but potentially entice a harsher sentence.
In a nutshell...
Homicide and murder charges have a range of defence strategies which can be utilized. Self defence is usually considered the most justifiable homicide strategy due to the factors it presents. It is important to engage an expert criminal defense attorney to provide you advice and assistance with common defence strategies that may be available.
No matter the situation, homicide cases are some of the most serious criminal charges you can be subjected to. Any possible defenses should be explored, whether that be mental health, self defense, mistaken identity, etc. Your lawyer will likely even advise a defense which is specific to your situation alone.
Contact Jameson Law today for all your legal assistance and criminal law needs.