Criminal law is subject to constant legislative reform, review and criminal justice reform. Crime prevention research is a continual process and criminal law trends and challenges need to be assessed to determine what changes may or may not need to be made.
Major challenges facing the criminal justice system include, prison population issues, International criminal law, and rehabilitative/punitive measures. These are only a few of the many challenges that face criminal law in both the present and future due to the high level of criminal offending we are seeing in the community.
Criminal justice reform is a complicated and fluid area of law. If you require any information about how these matters may affect and your criminal offending, Jameson Law have a team of highly trained and skilled criminal lawyers ready to assist you.
Prison Capacity
Overpopulation of the prison system is a concerning issue which affects not only individual states and territories but the nation as a whole. It is also an international concern as the level of criminal offending rises across the world. There are requirements within the prison for certain amenities which must be provided and prison conditions which need to be adhered to.
The major challenge in this respect is that prisoners are in fluxing at such a dramatic growth that accommodations cannot be made. There are not enough cells, guards, amenities and facilities to keep up with the demand and funding does not easily exist to expand the facilities available.
This is one of the reasons why electronic monitoring is a more widely accepted punitive measure as it removes some of the pressure from the prison system. Solutions of this nature are being more widely explored, particularly in smaller states where they have limited remand and prison centers available.
Another difficulties facing prisons both presently and in the future is the availability of drugs within the system. Remand centers and prisons have ling struggled with the easy access and availability of drugs within their facilities. Despite attempts to keep drugs out, there is a disproportionate number of guards to prisoners and it is a challenging task.
It is difficult to enhance prisoner reform in circumstances where illegal substances are rampant. The criminal justice system does what it can to tackle this issue but it is becoming increasingly more challenging.
For example, a drug aversion course being offered within the prison is going to have little to no effect on addicts if they have available access to illicit substances. In this regard, a stricter drug policy or drug screening process must be imposed and substances successfully removed from the facility before rehab practices will have an impact.
Case Study
The court is seeking to remand Clive in custody prior to his matter being heard but Clive's lawyer are concerned about the overpopulation of the prison at present. The conditions for inmates are being described as inhumane within the current prison system and his lawyer argues this is one of the main criminal justice issues facing the court at present.
They urge that Clive be remanded as a last resort. The application is granted and Clive is released on bail however with strict conditions. Clive will be required to commit not further crimes in this time or his bail may be revoked.
International Law
International criminal justice systems are a combination of jurisdictions under the united nations working towards one international standard. The basic principles rely on a cooperation of the international community to bring war crimes, hate crimes, crimes against humanity, etc, before the international criminal court.
The International criminal court or international criminal tribunal only considers matters under the Rome Statute and the criminal justice process relies on the inter-cooperation of many countries. This is primarily because there cannot be a breach of sovereignty so even if charges are laid it may be difficult to remand the defendant to stand trial due to the universal jurisdiction.
For example, a Russian diplomat accused of war crimes and violation of human rights may be unable to be brought before the criminal court due to Russia not providing his transport. It is not possible for international law enforcement to enter the sovereignty of certain countries to obtain defendants without that countries permission. Of course if permission is granted then that is different.
Historically, it has been the case that some countries would deal with these matters themselves and either detain or execute the accused. From a political perspective this is problematic as the accused are never brought to justice.
Case Study
Various different governments and agencies are also lobbying for Petrov's transport to the Hague as his offending has had major political and environmental impacts on various different nations and governments across the world. The evidence against Petrov will ensure a conviction and officials are confident that he will be required to serve a life imprisonment.
Unfortunately, official in Petrov's home country will not agree for him to be released to the Hague. It is unclear whether this is due to a concern that additional charges could be added once he is released to officials or that he could divulge sensitive information to try and protect himself. Due to international standards and practice however, they are within their rights not to release Petrov at this stage.
Due to his history of mental illness, the limited risk of harm to members of the community (he was in possession, he didn't use it to harm or threaten anyone) his legal representative successfully made an application for a Section 32.
Rehabilitative Measures
There is a growing recognition that rehabilitative courses and measures play a vital role in the decrease of criminal offending however this may not be the case in the future. The rising level of entitlement within society has created new found challenges for rehabilitation.
It is more common for a criminal sentence to include a rehabilitative competent than it was previously as trends suggest this is the more effective way of reaching people. Unfortunately, the trends did not predict that by looking to a more rehabilitative sentencing approach, we would be sending the message that sentencing will not be harsh and therefore community deterrence seems to have decreased.
Replacing a term of imprisonment for example with education and rehab has resulted in a widespread understanding that criminal offending will be met with sympathy instead of anger. Whilst this may not be one size fits all it is a concern.
Case Study
Unfortunately, in Roger's case, he received a false understanding that if he continued to engage in criminal activity of this nature, he would not be subject to harsh criminal punishment. In this instance however the chief prosecutor is seeking a term of imprisonment for Roger due to his lack of reformed behaviour and the increase in his offending. The level of distribution the second time was significantly higher.
His lawyer however seeks a suspended term of imprisonment based on Roger's poor mental health and drug addiction issues. They argue that Roger has suffered with drug issues since he was 17 and that this has largely contributed to his offending. If Roger can address his drug issues then perhaps his offending would cease.
The court considers that a harsher reality need to be imposed, especially since Roger was given the opportunity to address his drug issues previously and chose not to participate fully. They impose a 3 year term of imprisonment with possible parole in 22 months. Due to his history of mental illness, the limited risk of harm to members of the community (he was in possession, he didn't use it to harm or threaten anyone) his legal representative successfully made an application for a Section 32.
In a nutshell...
In recent years we have seen punishments change to include home detention and home monitoring through advanced technologies as a punishment over terms of imprisonment. This is a desperate attempt to release pressure on the system. It is ultimately unknown whether these methods pose a greater risk to society as a result but the courts are in conflict as to the right approach.
The future of criminal justice is reliant on continual reform to the criminal justice systems in line with evidence and community practices.